linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/6 ]Ext4 credits caclulation cleanup and fix that for nonextent writepage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080813101943.GF6439@skywalker>
Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:49:43 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc:	tytso <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6 ]Ext4 credits caclulation cleanup and fix that for
	nonextent writepage

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:25:54AM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> +int ext4_meta_trans_blocks(struct inode* inode, int nrblocks, int idxblocks)
> +{
> +	int groups, gdpblocks;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	groups = nrblocks + idxblocks;
> +	gdpblocks = groups;
> +	if (groups > EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_groups_count)
> +		groups = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_groups_count;
> +	if (groups > EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_gdb_count)
> +		gdpblocks = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_gdb_count;


I guess we should pass chunk to ext4_meta_trans_blocks also.
if (chunk) we should update only one group descriptor and one
bitmap block ie, 
if(chunk)
	groups = 1 + idxblocks;



> +
> +	/* bitmaps and block group descriptor blocks */
> +	ret += groups + gdpblocks;
> +
> +	ret += idxblocks;
> +
> +	/* journalled mode, include buffer to modify data blocks */
> +	if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode))
> +		ret += nrblocks;
> +
> +	/* Blocks for super block, inode, quota and xattr blocks */
> +	ret += EXT4_META_TRANS_BLOCKS(inode->i_sb);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
....
...

> +static int ext4_writeblocks_trans_credits_old(struct inode *inode, int nrblocks,
> +					      int chunk)
>  {
> -	int bpp = ext4_journal_blocks_per_page(inode);
> -	int indirects = (EXT4_NDIR_BLOCKS % bpp) ? 5 : 3;
> +	int indirects;
>  	int ret;
> 
> -	if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL)
> -		return ext4_ext_writepage_trans_blocks(inode, bpp);
> -
> -	if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode))
> -		ret = 3 * (bpp + indirects) + 2;
> -	else
> -		ret = 2 * (bpp + indirects) + 2;
> +	/*
> +	 * How many index blocks need to touch to modify nrblocks?
> +	 * The "Chunk" flag indicating whether the nrblocks is
> +	 * physically contigous on disk
> +	 *
> + 	 * For Direct IO and fallocate, they calls get_block to allocate
> + 	 * one single extent at a time, so they could set the "Chunk" flag
> +	 */
> +	indirects = ext4_indirect_trans_blocks(inode, nrblocks, chunk);
> 
> -#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
> -	/* We know that structure was already allocated during DQUOT_INIT so
> -	 * we will be updating only the data blocks + inodes */
> -	ret += 2*EXT4_QUOTA_TRANS_BLOCKS(inode->i_sb);
> -#endif
> +	/* Account for block group bitmaps and block groups
> +	 * descriptors.Worse case, the nrblocks+indirects blocks spread
> +	 * over different block groups
> +	 */
> +	ret = ext4_meta_trans_blocks(inode, nrblocks, indirects);
> 
>  	return ret;
>  }

-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html