linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix small file fragmentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080815133803.GL13048@mit.edu>
Date:	Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:38:03 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	cmm@...ibm.com, sandeen@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix small file fragmentation

Here's an interesting data point.  Using Chris Mason's compilebench:

http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/compilebench

If I use:

./compilebench  -D /mnt -i 2 -r 0

on a 4GB machine such that I have plenty of memory (and nothing gets
forced disk due to memory pressure), I don't see hardly any of the
small file fragmentation problem (0.8% of the inodes in use on the
filesystem.  This is with your patch applied.

However, if I use:

./compilebench  -D /mnt -i 10 -r 0

so that data blocks are getting pushed out due to memory pressure,
then I see plenty of non-contiugous inodes (8.1% of the inodes in use
on the filesystem).  So with your patch applied, it seems that we
still have a problem related to delayed allocation and how the VM
system is doing its page cleaning.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html