[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A963A9.107@bull.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:57:29 +0200
From: Celine Bourde <celine.bourde@...l.net>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
jean-pierre.dion@...l.net, frederic.bohe@...l.net,
SOLOFO RAMANGALAHY <Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net>,
"Jose R. Santos" <jrs@...ibm.com>, celine.bourde@...l.net
Subject: Ext4 test results
Hi all,
I have launch valerie's performance test to compare ext4 evolution from
kernel 2.6.26-rc2 to kernel 2.6.27-rc1.
Both results are available here :
http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080530/ffsb-write-2.6.26-rc2.htm <http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080818-ffsb/ffsb-write-2.6.27-rc1.html>
http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080818-ffsb/ffsb-write-2.6.27-rc1.html
barriers were disabled for this tests.
We could notice significant improvement of number of
extents per file with following cases :
mkfs option : -I 256 -O uninit_groups
mount option : data=writeback, nomballoc
and
mkfs option : -I 256 -O uninit_groups,flex_bg -G 64
mount option : data=writeback, nomballoc
fsck time appears now constant (kernel 2.6.27-rc1).
Cel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists