lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080819191508.GD8318@parisc-linux.org> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:15:08 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rwheeler@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, chris.mason@...cle.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] add hrtimer_sleep_ns helper function On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 03:08:19PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > -static int __sched do_nanosleep(struct hrtimer_sleeper *t, enum hrtimer_mode mode) > +static int __sched do_nanosleep(struct hrtimer_sleeper *t, enum hrtimer_mode mode, > + int interruptible) > { > hrtimer_init_sleeper(t, current); > > do { > - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > + set_current_state(interruptible ? TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE : > + TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); I don't see any users (in this patch or the next) of people wanting uninterruptible nanosleeps. We shouldn't be introducing new TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE users, but instead using TASK_KILLABLE if the user really can't cope with signals in a sensible manner. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists