[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080829082500.GC6447@skywalker>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:55:00 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, sandeen@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V3 09/11] ext4: Fix ext4 nomballoc allocator for ENOSPC
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:06:14PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
>
> 在 2008-08-29五的 09:14 +0530,Aneesh Kumar K.V写道:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 02:57:49PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
> > >
> > > ext4: Fix ext4 nomballoc allocator for ENOSPC
> > >
> > > We run into ENOSPC error on nonmballoc ext4, even when there is free blocks
> > > on the filesystem.
> > >
> > > The problem is triggered in the case the goal block group has 0 free blocks
> > > , and the rest block groups are skipped due to the check of "free_blocks
> > > < windowsz/2".
> >
> > The goal block group had free blocks < windowsz .
> >
> Hmm, if the goal block group had free blocks, why allocation failed
> (reservation is turned off by setting my_rsv as NULL)? I wonder if there
> is other threads trying to allocating in the same goal block group at
> the same time, steal the last free blocks?
>
We are trying block allocation with a grp_target_blk there and even if
reservation is turned off it can return ENOSPC.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists