[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080915175305.GS4563@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:53:05 -0700
From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>, Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vfs: vfs-level fiemap interface
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:49:48AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I agree to you (or someone elses - don't remember anymore) suggestion
> to put in more padding so we can add fields later. I strongly disagree
> putting in features now that we neither have a user, nor a usecase or
> testcase for.
So, how about another 64 bits of padding in struct fiemap_extent? That could
help cover future uses like compression, which might require another 64 bit
offset field - we only have 32 bits of reserved space there right now.
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists