[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080929211340.GF4563@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:13:40 -0700
From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vfs: vfs-level fiemap interface
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 09:07:20PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Do you have time to update the fiemap patchset so we can hopefully
> come to consensus and get this pushed to Linus in time for the
> upcoming merge window?
I can probably do this early next week. If that's not soon enough, I won't
be offended if you or someone else does the update. I agree, it seems like
we're pretty close to consensus.
> If not, I can take over for you and take over the care and feeding of
> this patchset so it can get pushed to Linus ASAP; I think we are
> pretty close to consensus on this interface, and I'd rather that we
> not lose momentum.
Why not let this sit in -mm for a cycle? I know how that sounds, considering
how long it's taken everyone to decide what color to paint the bicycle shed,
but at the least it'd give other file systems a chance to write their own
support patches. There's also the benefit of a little extra time for
ext4/ocfs2 to debug their own support patches. Do we lose any momentum if
the patches are 'complete' and in -mm with a target for 2.6.29?
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists