[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1223525160-9887-42-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 00:05:59 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 41/42] ext4: Avoid double dirtying of super block in ext4_put_super()
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
While reading code I noticed that ext4_put_super() dirties the
superblock bh twice. It is always done in ext4_commit_super()
too. Remove the redundant dirty operation.
Should be a nop semantically.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 9c02146..7d86560 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -512,8 +512,6 @@ static void ext4_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
EXT4_CLEAR_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER);
es->s_state = cpu_to_le16(sbi->s_mount_state);
- BUFFER_TRACE(sbi->s_sbh, "marking dirty");
- mark_buffer_dirty(sbi->s_sbh);
ext4_commit_super(sb, es, 1);
}
if (sbi->s_proc) {
--
1.5.6.1.205.ge2c7.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists