[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081012203147.GF12662@mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:31:47 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: cmm@...ibm.com, sandeen@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Use an rb tree for tracking blocks freed during
transaction.
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:02:07PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> With this patch we track the block freed during a transaction using
> rb tree. We also make sure contiguos blocks freed are collected
> in one rb node.
There seems to be a memory leak. Over time, the number of active
objects in ext4_free_block_extents goes up. You can check via:
grep ext4_free_block_extents /proc/slabinfo
I think the problem is here:
> + /* Now try to see the extent can be merged to left and right */
> + node = rb_prev(new_node);
> + if (node) {
> + entry = rb_entry(node, struct ext4_free_data, node);
> + if (can_merge(entry, new_entry)) {
> + new_entry->start_blk = entry->start_blk;
> + new_entry->count += entry->count;
> + rb_erase(node, &(db->bb_free_root));
> + list_del(&entry->list);
> }
> + }
We aren't freeing new_entry in ext4_mb_free_metadata() in the case
where the extent can be merged with an existing node in the rbtree.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists