linux-ext4 - Re: minix/ext2 + rd problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081015192254.GL15064@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:22:54 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc:	Richard Kojedzinszky <krichy@...etwork.hu>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: minix/ext2 + rd problem

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 04:34:25PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> You can flush and invalidate the blockdev with the --flushbufs argument
> to blockdev command. However you can't use this with ramdisk devices:
> someone thought it would be a good idea to save on precious ioctl space
> and implemented totally different semantics on that device with the
> same ioctl (it throws away the underlying data as well as the cache).

What happens if we declare that a bug and fix it (and add a new ioctl to
actually throw away the data ... oh, wait, we have one, it's BLKDISCARD)?

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html