[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18688.27755.969223.822862@frecb006361.adech.frec.bull.fr>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:22:03 +0200
From: Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net
To: Arjan De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: jbd/jbd2 performance improvements
Ric Wheeler writes:
> Do you have any details on the test case that you ran that showed a
> clear improvement? What kind of storage & IO pattern did you use?
Is it possible to record latencytop output (like top batch mode) to
capture the highest latency during a test run?
Or how did you collect this:
>my reproducer is sadly very simple (claws-mail is my mail client that uses maildir)
>Process claws-mail (4896) Total: 2829.7 msec
>EXT3: Waiting for journal access 2491.0 msec 88.4 %
>Writing back inodes 160.9 msec 5.7 %
>synchronous write 78.8 msec 3.0 %
>is an example of such a trace (this is with patch, without patch the numbers are about 3x bigger)
>Waiting for journal access is "journal_get_write_access"
>Writing back inodes is "writeback_inodes"
>synchronous write is "do_sync_write"
--
solofo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists