[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081104173707.GM30291@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:37:07 -0500
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: cmm@...ibm.com, sandeen@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -v2 6/9] ext4: Call journal commit callback without
holding j_list_lock
I suggest adding the following description and to change the prefix to
be jbd2, not ext4, since the change applies 100% to jbd2 code (and so
it could potentially apply to ocfs2 if they decide to use this
callback, for example).
jbd2: Call journal commit callback without holding j_list_lock
Avoid freeing the transaction in __jbd2_journal_drop_transaction() so
the journal commit callback can run without holding j_list_lock, to
avoid lock contention on this spinlock.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists