lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:42:02 -0500
From:	Theodore Tso <>
To:	Andrew Morton <>
Subject: Re: [patch 24/51] ext3: wait on all pending commits in ext3_sync_fs

On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 02:20:20PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:44:31 -0500
> Theodore Tso <> wrote:
> > My version of this patch also cleaned up the following comment, which
> > has been wrong since 2.5.70 or thereabouts...
> oh, I didn't spot that.
> I looked at the version in linux-next and saw that it was propagating
> the error value back to the VFS as well.  Or maybe that was done in a
> separate patch, dunno.  But while that's a good change, I felt that we
> should separate it from this bugfix.  I meant to mention it but I
> forgot, sorry.

Fair enough.  Propagating the return value to the VFS is also a
cleanup, although given that the VFS drops return value on the floor,
I considered it a risk-free change and included it in the ext4 version
of the patch.  But yeah, I can see why separating could be argued to
be the right thing.

So that means we'll need two cleanup patches for ext3; one to fix the
comment, and another to propagate the error code back to the VFS.

	     	     		      	    	 - Ted
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists