[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081111110910.4a6f7941@zest>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:09:10 -0500
From: "Michael B. Trausch" <mike@...usch.us>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "tune2fs -I 256" runtime---can it be interrupted safely?
On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:16:43 -0700
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com> wrote:
> If you have time, after the backup is done could you please re-try the
> "tune2fs -I 256" operation and let it go for a while, then "ltrace -p
> {pid}" on the process from another window to see what it is doing (if
> anything). You may need to have the "e2fsprogs-debuginfo" RPM
> installed to get useful data there.
>
> After grabbing some of the data with ltrace, also run "strace -p
> {pid}" to get disk IO information, and finally "gdb -p {pid}" and
> grab a stack trace with "bt", let it continue for a few seconds with
> "c", and then CTRL-C again and grab another stack trace with "bt".
Ugh, I forgot to do the gdb backtraces. *headdesk* I will do another
run with them later.
I do have an ltrace up and online at:
http://fd0man.theunixplace.com/tune2fs.ltrace.bz2
The bzip2 file is 44 MB, and the uncompressed text is _huge_ (about 3
GB). This is a two hour run of "tune2fs -I 256 /dev/sdb" on an
external 250 GB (235 GiB) drive formatted with the ext3 filesystem.
I aborted the tune2fs run after 2 hours, though I am sure it would have
run for far longer. Hopefully, this will give some insight as to what
the problem might be.
I _was_ hoping that it would make a difference in runtime that the
filesystem was empty (I did this right after "mkfs.ext3 -I
128 /dev/sdb"), but it was still going very slowly...
--- Mike
--
My sigfile ran away and is on hiatus.
http://www.trausch.us/
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists