lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081113204240.GF21652@mit.edu>
Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:42:40 -0500
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext4 unlink performance

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 01:10:00PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:57:12PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> > Ouch.  Why is ext4 so much slower than ext3 here,
> 
> I forgot to mention one important detail.  I started running 'vmstat 5'
> during one of the unlink runs, and noticed that there were intervals of
> 15 or 20 seconds where no blocks were being read or written, and minimal
> CPU was being used.  I do not observe the same stalls when using ext3.

Hmm... how very strange.  Can you run the command:

       ps -eo pid,tid,class,rtprio,ni,pri,psr,pcpu,stat,wchan:16,comm

during one of the quiescent periods, and see what is in the WCHAN
field for the unlink command?

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ