lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:40:38 +0100
From:	Frédéric Bohé <frederic.bohe@...l.net>
To:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Errors with 1024 block size

Le mardi 18 novembre 2008 à 16:54 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> With block size 1024 on x86 i am getting different errors listed below
> I can't reproduce them always.
> 
> 
> 
> [root@...19 tmp]# ls -al /mnt/tmp/f/p369/d3/d6/d39/db2/dee/d10f/d3f/l71
> ls: /mnt/tmp/f/p369/d3/d6/d39/db2/dee/d10f/d3f/l71: Stale NFS file handle
> [root@...19 tmp]# ls -al /mnt/tmp/f/p369/d3/d6/d39/db2/dee/d10f/d3f/
> total 411
> drwxrwxrwx 3 689933 root    1024 Nov 18 05:59 .
> drwxrwxrwx 3   8391 root    1024 Nov 18 05:59 ..
> drwxrwxrwx 2 root   root    1024 Nov 18 05:33 d83
> -rw-rw-rw- 1 root   root       0 Nov 18 05:06 fb4
> -rw-rw-rw- 1 root   root 3350138 Nov 18 05:33 fb9
> ?--------- ? ?      ?          ?            ? l71
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root   root     509 Nov 18 05:23 ld9 -> xxxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx
> [root@...19 tmp]# 
> 
> dmesg gives:
> 
> EXT4-fs error (device sdb1): ext4_free_inode: bit already cleared for inode 168449

I had reproduced this one easily while deleting files on a file system
with several concurrent threads. I have noticed that the inode reported
in the error message is always the first inode of a group ( X *
inode_per_group + 1 ). I have not investigated further since I am
working on another error which happens during the online resize :

EXT4-fs error (device md0): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used: Allocating
block in system zone - block = 6873089

This one happens only with 1024 bytes blocks too, but I am not sure if
it is really related to the block size yet.

Fred


> 
> 
> Some other message i got before. But i didn't capture the info fully 
> 
> a) "Deleting nonexistent file ..." warning in ext4_unlink
> 
> b) "Empty directory has too many links..." in ext4_rmdir
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists