[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081127053726.GC28952@skywalker>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:07:26 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: cmm@...ibm.com, sandeen@...hat.com, vallesroc@...il.com,
Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net, cryptooctoploid@...il.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Fix the delalloc writepages to allocate
blocks at the right offset.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:53:21AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 03:12:27PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > When iterating through the pages with all mapped buffer_heads
> > we failed to update the b_state value. This result in allocating
> > blocks at logical offset 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Hey Aneesh,
>
> I've been going through patches in the patch queue and I noticed that
> the subsequent patch
>
> [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Mark the buffer_heads as dirty and uptodate after prepare_write
>
> has been merged to mainline, but this one wasn't. From looking at the
> e-mail record, you said that the second one fixed the rtorrent
> corruption --- but looking at this patch and its description, it looks
> like this one should perhaps get pushed to Linus ASAP as well. Do you
> remember if both patches were needed to fix the rtorrent corruption
> problem, or only the second one?
Both patches are not needed to fix the rtorrent problem. The second
patch actually fix the rtorrent issue.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists