lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:30:31 +0100
To:	Theodore Tso <>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] ext4 resize: Mark the added group with

Hi Ted,

Theodore Tso writes:
 > 2) You need to set the flag *before* you calculate the block group
 > checksum, not afterwards.

Sorry about this. I forgot to do the quilt refresh (and check that the
code I submit is the same that the code I run).

 > 1) You didn't include a Developer's Certification of Origin (i.e., a
 > "Signed-off-by" header).  Since this is a one line patch, and it seems
 > pretty clear your intention is to submit this to Linus,

This was really an RFC, as you also pointed out.
Regarding this patch, the discussion raised the question of whether
EXT4_BG_INODE_UNINIT or EXT4_BG_ITABLE_UNINIT would be more coherent
This was also used as an example for the discussion about doing the
initialization outside of an init thread (which turned up not to be a
good idea).
This is also the first use of EXT4_BG_INODE_ZEROED in the kernel, so
an occasion to revisit the name. 
I did not look carefully in the progs (EXT2_BG_INODE_ZEROED) to see if
it is desirable and easy to change it. cscope indicates that it may be
easy (4 instances).

 > So the corrected patch should look like this....

Thank you, that's settled then,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists