[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <493F4EF4.4080205@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:09:08 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu_counter: Fix __percpu_counter_sum()
Now percpu_counter_sum() is 'fixed', what about "percpu_counter_add()" ?
void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch)
{
s64 count;
s32 *pcount;
int cpu = get_cpu();
pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu);
count = *pcount + amount;
if (count >= batch || count <= -batch) {
spin_lock(&fbc->lock);
fbc->count += count;
*pcount = 0;
spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
} else {
*pcount = count;
}
put_cpu();
}
If I read this well, this is not IRQ safe.
get_cpu() only disables preemption IMHO
For nr_files, nr_dentry, nr_inodes, it should not be a problem.
But for network counters (only in net-next-2.6)
and lib/proportions.c, we have a problem ?
Using local_t instead of s32 for cpu
local counter here is possible, so that fast path doesnt have
to disable interrupts
(use a local_t instead of s32 for fbc->counters)
void __percpu_counter_add_irqsafe(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch)
{
long count;
local_t *pcount;
/* following code only matters on 32bit arches */
if (sizeof(amount) != sizeof(local_t)) {
if (unlikely(amount >= batch || amount <= -batch))) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&fbc->lock, flags);
fbc->count += amount;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fbc->lock, flags);
return;
}
}
pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, get_cpu());
count = local_add_return((long)amount, pcount);
if (unlikely(count >= batch || count <= -batch)) {
unsigned long flags;
local_sub(count, pcount);
spin_lock_irqsave(&fbc->lock, flags);
fbc->count += count;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fbc->lock, flags);
}
put_cpu();
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists