[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081216040011.GF11502@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:00:11 -0500
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Allow ext4 to run without a journal.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 09:35:55AM -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 15:54 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > A few weeks ago I posted a patch for discussion that allowed ext4 to run
> > without a journal. Since that time I've integrated the excellent
> > comments from Andreas and fixed several serious bugs. We're currently
> > running with this patch and generating some performance numbers against
> > both ext2 (with backported reservations code) and ext4 with and without
> > a journal. It just so happens that running without a journal is
> > slightly faster for most everything.
>
> Has anyone had a chance to take a look at this? Andreas? Ted? Anyone?
For some reason it didn't show up in my mailbox; maybe an errant SPAM
checker grabbed it? (For some reason Herbert Xu's mail server
recently blacklisted my mail server, so he can't get any e-mails from
me, whether it's a reply to LKML or an invite to the kernel summit.
More recently Baracuda Networks, which handles mit.edu's spam
filtering, blacklisted the mail server for the vendor-sec mailing
list. Go figure.)
Fortunately your patch did show up in patchwork:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ext4/
I've been travelling, so I haven't had a chance to look at it,
although I did note that it had showed up over the weekend when I was
going over the patch queue and reconciling it with Patchwork, and
wondered why I hadn't seen earlier...
I will try to get it shortly.
Regards,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists