[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <494D471C.8030907@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:27:24 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Matteo Croce <technoboy85@...il.com>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Massive filesystem corruption
Matteo Croce wrote:
> Hi,
> i've lost my ext4 partition with a 2.6.27 vanilla kernel:
>
> root@...ntu:~# mount -t ext4dev /dev/sda1 /mnt
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda1,
> missing codepage or helper program, or other error
> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> dmesg | tail or so
What happened between the last successful mount and this failure?
> root@...ntu:~# dmesg | tail -1
> [ 4874.514703] VFS: Can't find ext4 filesystem on dev sda1.
Was there anything before that? (i.e. check tail -n 10?)
What does the beginning of the fs look like, maybe you can put the first
16k or so of a dd somewehre, or run it through hexdump -C, see if
something else stomped on this partition.
> root@...ntu:~# e2fsck /dev/sda1
> e2fsck 1.41.3 (12-Oct-2008)
> e2fsck: Superblock invalid, trying backup blocks...
> /dev/sda1 was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Error1: Corrupt extent header on inode 107192
> Aborted (core dumped)
> root@...ntu:~# gdb -q --args e2fsck /dev/sda1
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /sbin/e2fsck /dev/sda1
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> e2fsck 1.41.3 (12-Oct-2008)
> /sbin/e2fsck: Superblock invalid, trying backup blocks...
> /dev/sda1 was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Error1: Corrupt extent header on inode 107192
> [New Thread 0xb7e46700 (LWP 12878)]
>
> Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
well, this was an explicit abort():
if (pctx->errcode) {
printf("Error1: %s on inode %u\n",
error_message(pctx->errcode), pctx->ino);
abort();
}
... I guess that error is not handled yet.
can you open the fs with debugfs, and try
debugfs> stat <107192>
and/or
debugfs> dump <107192> /some/path/to/dumpfile
and maybe we can see what's wrong with this inode. If it's the only one
then perhaps it can be nuked w/ debugfs and fsck will continue.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists