linux-ext4 - Re: Autoremoval of test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081222022815.GD23723@mit.edu>
Date:	Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:28:15 -0500
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Autoremoval of test_fs flag kinda sucks

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 08:43:27AM -0500, Joseph Fannin wrote:
> This is mostly me blowing off a little steam here, so yeah.  But maybe
> it won't hurt to send out a heads up and get this in the archives:
> 
> Booting a 2.6.28-pre kernel will cause e2fsck to remove the test_fs
> flag from any filesystem it checks, presumably because "ext4dev" has
> become "ext4" in 2.6.28.  If your root fs is on ext4, this makes it
> impossible to reboot back into a older kernel (i.e. < 2.6.28) since it
> will refuse to mount an ext4dev fs without the "test_fs" flag set --
> unless you chase after e2fsck and set the flag back.

Yeah, Sorry I guess I didn't think it was going to be *that* common
for people to be going back and forth between the boundary.  It is
possible to disable this, BTW, via /etc/e2fsck.conf:

[options]
	clear_test_fs_flag = false

The assumption I made was that the number of pre-2.6.28 ext4 users
would be small, and so it would be safe to default the option to true.

      	 	       	  	   	- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html