[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0812290718130.24239@bogon.housecafe.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:23:50 +0100 (CET)
From: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Free blocks count wrong following shrink with resize2fs
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
> The net result is the blocks that should be released as being free
> aren't, which is what causes the e2fsck errors, which can be easily
> corrected. It doesn't cause any other problems, though.
Aha, thanks for the explanation. I was just playing around with resize2fs,
so no real data was at stake in this case anyway...
>> [ 1.737198] EXT3-fs: hda1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (240).
>> [ 1.754302] EXT4-fs: barriers enabled
>
> This is normal; the kernel simply tries to mount the filesystem using
> ext3 first, so that the ext4 code only gets used for filesystems that
Ah, I see. When I disabled EXT3* in my .config, the kernel starts with
EXT4 and the "error" goes away...
Btw, ext4 feels pretty neat already, with vanilla kernel and userland
tools, no patches applied ...just like a *real* filesystem - great! :-)
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #259:
Someone's tie is caught in the printer, and if anything else gets printed, he'll be in it too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists