[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea11fea30901012324r511131f9r13ab09dc76370196@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:54:30 +0530
From: "Manish Katiyar" <mkatiyar@...il.com>
To: Kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...linux.org>,
Linux-Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: confusion in validation of rec_len in ext2_add_link
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to understand the purpose of the below check for
> validating rec_len in the function ext2_add_link(). Before reaching
> line 515 we call ext2_get_page() which checks for valid entries on the
> page and thus validates the rec_len too. And then we call the
> lock_page(), so is this check redundant
Got the answer here
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0204.1/0440.html
Thanks -
Manish
> or to avoid cases when
> something could have changed on the page between the lines 497 and 501
> ?
>
> ext2_add_link() {
>
> ........
> 497 page = ext2_get_page(dir, n, 0);
> 499 if (IS_ERR(page))
> 500 goto out;
> 501 lock_page(page);
> .........
> 515 if (de->rec_len == 0) {
> 516 ext2_error(dir->i_sb, __func__,
> 517 "zero-length directory entry");
> 518 err = -EIO;
> 519 goto out_unlock;
> 520 }
>
> ..........
> }
>
> Thanks -
> Manish
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists