[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1LK26o-0004Wm-N0@closure.thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:55:58 -0500
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Patches in the ext4 patch queue that should be marked for -stable
I believe the following patches should be destined for -stable kernel
tree in the ext4 patch queue.
Have I missed any patches? Do you believe any of these patches
*shouldn't* be added to the stable kernel?
* add-barrier-check-to-journal_wait_on_commit_record
* aneesh-2-add-blocks-added-during-resize-to-bitmap
* aneesh-3-use_EXT4_GROUP_INFO_NEED_INIT_BIT-during-resize
* aneesh-7-dont-use-blocks-freed-but-not-yet-committed-in-buddy-cache-init
* aneesh-8-fix-double-free-of-blocks
* avoid-ext4-error-for-single-bg-fs
* dont-overwrite-allocation_context-ac_status
* ext4-Don-t-allow-new-groups-to-be-added-during-bloc.patch
* ext4-Fix-s_dirty_blocks_counter-if-block-allocation.patch
* ext4-Init-the-complete-page-while-building-buddy-ca.patch
* ext4-Use-new-buffer_head-flag-to-check-uninit-group.patch
* ext4-mark-the-blocks-inode-bitmap-beyond-end-of-gro.patch
* fix-delalloc-writepages-to-allocate-at-correct-offset
* fix-race-between-read_block_bitmap-and-mark_diskspace_used
* fix-race-between-read_inode_bitmap-and-ext4_new_inode
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists