Date:	Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:46:59 -0800
From:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
To:	jbacik@...hat.com, adilger@....com, arjan@...radead.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, rwheeler@...hat.com,
	mm-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: - jbd-improve-fsync-batching.patch removed from -mm tree


The patch titled
     jbd: improve fsync batching
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     jbd-improve-fsync-batching.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: jbd: improve fsync batching
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com>

There is a flaw with the way jbd handles fsync batching.  If we fsync() a
file and we were not the last person to run fsync() on this fs then we
automatically sleep for 1 jiffie in order to wait for new writers to join
into the transaction before forcing the commit.  The problem with this is
that with really fast storage (ie a Clariion) the time it takes to commit
a transaction to disk is way faster than 1 jiffie in most cases, so
sleeping means waiting longer with nothing to do than if we just committed
the transaction and kept going.  Ric Wheeler noticed this when using
fs_mark with more than 1 thread, the throughput would plummet as he added
more threads.

This patch attempts to fix this problem by recording the average time in
nanoseconds that it takes to commit a transaction to disk, and what time
we started the transaction.  If we run an fsync() and we have been running
for less time than it takes to commit the transaction to disk, we sleep
for the delta amount of time and then commit to disk.  We acheive
sub-jiffie sleeping using schedule_hrtimeout.  This means that the wait
time is auto-tuned to the speed of the underlying disk, instead of having
this static timeout.  I weighted the average according to somebody's
comments (Andreas Dilger I think) in order to help normalize random
outliers where we take way longer or way less time to commit than the
average.  I also have a min() check in there to make sure we don't sleep
longer than a jiffie in case our storage is super slow, this was requested
by Andrew.

I unfortunately do not have access to a Clariion, so I had to use a
ramdisk to represent a super fast array.  I tested with a SATA drive with
barrier=1 to make sure there was no regression with local disks, I tested
with a 4 way multipathed Apple Xserve RAID array and of course the
ramdisk.  I ran the following command

fs_mark -d /mnt/ext3-test -s 4096 -n 2000 -D 64 -t $i

where $i was 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32.  I mkfs'ed the fs each time.  Here are my
results

type	threads		with patch	without patch
sata	2		24.6		26.3
sata	4		49.2		48.1
sata	8		70.1		67.0
sata	16		104.0		94.1
sata	32		153.6		142.7

xserve	2		246.4		222.0
xserve	4		480.0		440.8
xserve	8		829.5		730.8
xserve	16		1172.7		1026.9
xserve	32		1816.3		1650.5

ramdisk	2		2538.3		1745.6
ramdisk	4		2942.3		661.9
ramdisk	8		2882.5		999.8
ramdisk	16		2738.7		1801.9
ramdisk	32		2541.9		2394.0

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/jbd/commit.c      |   15 +++++++++++++++
 fs/jbd/transaction.c |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/jbd.h  |   15 +++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/jbd/commit.c~jbd-improve-fsync-batching fs/jbd/commit.c
--- a/fs/jbd/commit.c~jbd-improve-fsync-batching
+++ a/fs/jbd/commit.c
@@ -306,6 +306,8 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_
 	int flags;
 	int err;
 	unsigned long blocknr;
+	ktime_t start_time;
+	u64 commit_time;
 	char *tagp = NULL;
 	journal_header_t *header;
 	journal_block_tag_t *tag = NULL;
@@ -418,6 +420,7 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_
 	commit_transaction->t_state = T_FLUSH;
 	journal->j_committing_transaction = commit_transaction;
 	journal->j_running_transaction = NULL;
+	start_time = ktime_get();
 	commit_transaction->t_log_start = journal->j_head;
 	wake_up(&journal->j_wait_transaction_locked);
 	spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
@@ -913,6 +916,18 @@ restart_loop:
 	J_ASSERT(commit_transaction == journal->j_committing_transaction);
 	journal->j_commit_sequence = commit_transaction->t_tid;
 	journal->j_committing_transaction = NULL;
+	commit_time = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start_time));
+
+	/*
+	 * weight the commit time higher than the average time so we don't
+	 * react too strongly to vast changes in commit time
+	 */
+	if (likely(journal->j_average_commit_time))
+		journal->j_average_commit_time = (commit_time*3 +
+				journal->j_average_commit_time) / 4;
+	else
+		journal->j_average_commit_time = commit_time;
+
 	spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
 
 	if (commit_transaction->t_checkpoint_list == NULL &&
diff -puN fs/jbd/transaction.c~jbd-improve-fsync-batching fs/jbd/transaction.c
--- a/fs/jbd/transaction.c~jbd-improve-fsync-batching
+++ a/fs/jbd/transaction.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/timer.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/highmem.h>
+#include <linux/hrtimer.h>
 
 static void __journal_temp_unlink_buffer(struct journal_head *jh);
 
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ get_transaction(journal_t *journal, tran
 {
 	transaction->t_journal = journal;
 	transaction->t_state = T_RUNNING;
+	transaction->t_start_time = ktime_get();
 	transaction->t_tid = journal->j_transaction_sequence++;
 	transaction->t_expires = jiffies + journal->j_commit_interval;
 	spin_lock_init(&transaction->t_handle_lock);
@@ -1370,7 +1372,7 @@ int journal_stop(handle_t *handle)
 {
 	transaction_t *transaction = handle->h_transaction;
 	journal_t *journal = transaction->t_journal;
-	int old_handle_count, err;
+	int err;
 	pid_t pid;
 
 	J_ASSERT(journal_current_handle() == handle);
@@ -1399,6 +1401,17 @@ int journal_stop(handle_t *handle)
 	 * on IO anyway.  Speeds up many-threaded, many-dir operations
 	 * by 30x or more...
 	 *
+	 * We try and optimize the sleep time against what the underlying disk
+	 * can do, instead of having a static sleep time.  This is usefull for
+	 * the case where our storage is so fast that it is more optimal to go
+	 * ahead and force a flush and wait for the transaction to be committed
+	 * than it is to wait for an arbitrary amount of time for new writers to
+	 * join the transaction.  We acheive this by measuring how long it takes
+	 * to commit a transaction, and compare it with how long this
+	 * transaction has been running, and if run time < commit time then we
+	 * sleep for the delta and commit.  This greatly helps super fast disks
+	 * that would see slowdowns as more threads started doing fsyncs.
+	 *
 	 * But don't do this if this process was the most recent one to
 	 * perform a synchronous write.  We do this to detect the case where a
 	 * single process is doing a stream of sync writes.  No point in waiting
@@ -1406,11 +1419,26 @@ int journal_stop(handle_t *handle)
 	 */
 	pid = current->pid;
 	if (handle->h_sync && journal->j_last_sync_writer != pid) {
+		u64 commit_time, trans_time;
+
 		journal->j_last_sync_writer = pid;
-		do {
-			old_handle_count = transaction->t_handle_count;
-			schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
-		} while (old_handle_count != transaction->t_handle_count);
+
+		spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+		commit_time = journal->j_average_commit_time;
+		spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+
+		trans_time = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(ktime_get(),
+						   transaction->t_start_time));
+
+		commit_time = min_t(u64, commit_time,
+				    1000*jiffies_to_usecs(1));
+
+		if (trans_time < commit_time) {
+			ktime_t expires = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(),
+						       commit_time);
+			set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+			schedule_hrtimeout(&expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
+		}
 	}
 
 	current->journal_info = NULL;
diff -puN include/linux/jbd.h~jbd-improve-fsync-batching include/linux/jbd.h
--- a/include/linux/jbd.h~jbd-improve-fsync-batching
+++ a/include/linux/jbd.h
@@ -543,6 +543,11 @@ struct transaction_s
 	unsigned long		t_expires;
 
 	/*
+	 * When this transaction started, in nanoseconds [no locking]
+	 */
+	ktime_t			t_start_time;
+
+	/*
 	 * How many handles used this transaction? [t_handle_lock]
 	 */
 	int t_handle_count;
@@ -798,9 +803,19 @@ struct journal_s
 	struct buffer_head	**j_wbuf;
 	int			j_wbufsize;
 
+	/*
+	 * this is the pid of the last person to run a synchronous operation
+	 * through the journal.
+	 */
 	pid_t			j_last_sync_writer;
 
 	/*
+	 * the average amount of time in nanoseconds it takes to commit a
+	 * transaction to the disk.  [j_state_lock]
+	 */
+	u64			j_average_commit_time;
+
+	/*
 	 * An opaque pointer to fs-private information.  ext3 puts its
 	 * superblock pointer here
 	 */
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from jbacik@...hat.com are

origin.patch
linux-next.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists