[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1231962169.14825.54.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:42:49 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:38 -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> > > Below is the result of full bisect
> > > futex: rely on get_user_pages() for shared futexes
> > However does a futex change make ext3 crap its pants?
> >
> > Is there anything more to it than start the machine, and reboot?
>
> Just system startup and reboot is enough to reproduce the problem. And 100%
> reproducible. So, does seem to be any timing involved either.
That's very odd indeed, non of my test systems nor Ingo's ever triggered
this, and that patch has been in -tip for a rather long time.
CommitDate: Tue Sep 30 12:35:20 2008 +0200
That's 3.5 months of test time.. most curious. What kind of userland do
you have that triggers this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists