[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49797056.7030607@rs.jp.nec.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:23:02 +0900
From: Akira Fujita <a-fujita@...jp.nec.com>
To: Derkjan de Haan <haanjdj@...il.com>
CC: Takashi Sato <t-sato@...jp.nec.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: can't get e4defrag to work
Hi Derkjan,
Thank you for using ext4 onlie defrag.
I tried to use the same kernel and command
(2.6.28 + http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/LATEST/broken-out.tar.bz2 )
and I got a fine result as follows.
[root@...086 broken-out]# ./e4defrag -v /mnt/mp1/file1
ext4 defragmentation for /mnt/mp1/file1
[1/1]/mnt/mp1/file1: 100% extents: 3 -> 1 [ OK ]
Success: [1/1]
My environment was:
[root@...086 broken-out]# uname -a
Linux bsd086 2.6.28 #2 SMP Thu Jan 22 09:55:13 JST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root@...086 broken-out]# mount
/dev/sda8 on /mnt/mp1 type ext4 (rw)
[root@...086 broken-out]# debugfs /dev/sda8
..
Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype n
eeds_recovery extent sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra
_isize
Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash
Default mount options: (none)
Filesystem state: clean
Errors behavior: Continue
Filesystem OS type: Linux
Inode count: 61824
Block count: 246991
Reserved block count: 12349
Free blocks: 223339
Free inodes: 61810
First block: 0
Block size: 4096
Fragment size: 4096
Reserved GDT blocks: 60
Blocks per group: 32768
Fragments per group: 32768
Inodes per group: 7728
..
Did you turn off the flex_bg feature in your case?
But the message "Inappropriate ioctl for device" you had is not
related to the flex_bg.
Something related to ioctl might be wrong in your case.
Were there any reject or hunks when you applied patches to kernel?
Did you boot with correct kernel?
I have no idea so can you tell me the detail of your test environment?
By the way, ext4 online defrag in the current ext4 patch queue (2.6.29-rc1)
does not work fine, because defrag does not handle some new ext4 functions correctly.
Therefore Ted commented them out recently.
I'm preparing to release new online defrag patches now.
Probably it will be the next week.
I appreciate it if you try to use new one as well.
Thanks,
Akira Fujita
Derkjan de Haan wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I have tried to compile a usable e4defrag but to no avail. It doesn't
> defrag anything, and in verbose mode it reports: "Defrag
> fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device".
>
> I have downloaded a stock 2.6.28 kernel, and applied all patches in
> http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/LATEST/broken-out.tar.bz2
> I have uncommented the defrag patches (except -00 (the changelog) and
> -09 (the defrag tool) in the series file, and run "quilt push -a". It
> reports all patches applied successfully. An example e4defrag run
> looks like this:
>
> [root@...hiba ~]# ./e4defrag -v .
> ext4 defragmentation for directory(.)
> [1/31] "/root"
> File is not regular file [ NG ]
> [2/31] "/root/.gnupg"
> File is not regular file [ NG ]
> [3/31]/root/.gnupg/gpg.conf: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [4/31] "/root/.gnupg/pubring.gpg"
> File size is 0 [ NG ]
> [5/31]/root/e4defrag: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [6/31] "/root/Mail"
> File is not regular file [ NG ]
> [7/31]/root/defrag-09-online-defrag-command.c: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [8/31] "/root/.gconfd"
> File is not regular file [ NG ]
> [9/31]/root/.gconfd/saved_state: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [10/31]/root/.bashrc: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [11/31] "/root/.kde"
> File is not regular file [ NG ]
> [12/31] "/root/.kde/cache-toshiba.badmuts.org"
> File is not regular file [ NG ]
> [13/31] "/root/.kde/tmp-toshiba.badmuts.org"
> File is not regular file [ NG ]
> [14/31]/root/.lesshst: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [15/31] "/root/.ketchup"
> File is not regular file [ NG ]
> [16/31]/root/.ketchup/patch-2.6.29-rc2.bz2: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [17/31]/root/install.log.syslog: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [18/31]/root/.bash_logout: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [19/31]/root/.bash_history: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [20/31]/root/.bash_profile: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [21/31]/root/anaconda-ks.cfg: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [22/31] "/root/.lftp"
> File is not regular file [ NG ]
> [23/31]/root/.lftp/rl_history: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [24/31]/root/.lftp/transfer_log: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [25/31]/root/.lftp/cwd_history: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [26/31]/root/.cshrc: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [27/31]/root/install.log: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [28/31]/root/.tcshrc: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [29/31] "/root/.ssh"
> File is not regular file [ NG ]
> [30/31]/root/.ssh/known_hosts: 0%
> Defrag fail:Inappropriate ioctl for device [ NG ]
> [31/31] "/root/.gconf"
> File is not regular file [ NG ]
>
> Success: [ 0/31 ]
> Failure: [ 31/31 ]
> Total extents: 36->36
> Fragmented percentage: 20%->20%
>
> I must be doing something wrong, but I can't figure out what. Do you
> have any hints?
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Derkjan de Haan
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists