lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <498AD58B.5000805@ph.tum.de>
Date:	Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:03:23 +0100
From:	Thiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@...tum.de>
To:	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [RFC] ext4_bmap() may return blocks outside filesystem

Hello,

during testing of ext4 with intentionally corrupted filesystem images I 
noticed that sometimes ext4_bmap() returns physical block numbers which 
lie outside of the filesystem.  In most cases, the error is caught by 
the block layer (?) leading to error messages of the kind:

attempt to access beyond end of device
loop0: rw=0, want=xxx, limit=xxx

But there also are cases which are not handled gracefully by bmap() callers.

I've attached a conceptual patch against 2.6.29-rc2 which fixes one case 
in which invalid block numbers are returned (there might be more) by 
adding sanity checks to ext4_ext_find_extent(), but before I start 
looking for further occurences, I'd like to ask whether you think my 
approach is reasonable.

Kind regards,

Thiemo Nagel

View attachment "concept.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (789 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ