[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49900FB5.9080705@ph.tum.de>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:12:53 +0100
From: Thiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@...tum.de>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Validate extent details only when read from the disk
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:31:46AM +0100, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
>> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> Make sure we validate extent details only when read from the disk.
>>>
>>> @@ -602,15 +607,13 @@ struct ext4_ext_path *
>>> ext4_ext_find_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t block,
>>> struct ext4_ext_path *path)
>>> {
>>> + int need_to_validate = 0;
>>> struct ext4_extent_header *eh;
>>> struct buffer_head *bh;
>>> short int depth, i, ppos = 0, alloc = 0;
>>>
>>> eh = ext_inode_hdr(inode);
>>> depth = ext_depth(inode);
>>> - if (ext4_ext_check(inode, eh, depth))
>>> - return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>>> -
>
> I am doing the check in ext4_iget while reading the inode from disk.
You're right, there is a check. I didn't notice that, because
ext4_iget() doesn't return an error.
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 03ba20b..a8bab39 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -4273,6 +4273,11 @@ struct inode *ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
> (__u64)(le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_version_hi)) << 32;
> }
>
> + if (ei->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL) {
> + /* Validate extent which is part of inode */
> + ext4_ext_check_inode(inode);
> + }
> +
I'd propose to change that to:
if (ei->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL) {
/* Validate extent which is part of inode */
if ((ret = ext4_ext_check_inode(inode)))
goto bad_inode;
}
Kind regards,
Thiemo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists