| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:21:50 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>
CC: "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: next-20090206: deadlock on ext4
Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> I have reproduced it with 2.6.29-rc4.
> Loop file was on XFS.
> I can not reproduce it on ext4 on raw device.
> Let me know if I can do anything else to help resolving it.
>
Can you try this patch from Aneesh? Works for me...
Thanks,
-Eric
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Don't use the range_cylic mode implemented by
write_cache_pages
With delayed allocation we lock the page in write_cache_pages and
try to build an in memory extent of contiguous blocks. This is
needed so that we can get a large contiguous blocks request. Now
with range_cyclic mode in write_cache_pages if we have not done an
I/O we loop back to 0 index and try to write the page. That would
imply we will attempt to take page lock of lower index page holding
the page lock of higher index page. This can cause a dead lock with
other writeback thread.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.28.x86_64/fs/ext4/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.28.x86_64.orig/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ linux-2.6.28.x86_64/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2437,6 +2437,7 @@ static int ext4_da_writepages(struct add
int no_nrwrite_index_update;
int pages_written = 0;
long pages_skipped;
+ int range_cyclic = 0, cycled = 1, io_done = 0;
int needed_blocks, ret = 0, nr_to_writebump = 0;
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(mapping->host->i_sb);
@@ -2488,9 +2489,14 @@ static int ext4_da_writepages(struct add
if (wbc->range_start == 0 && wbc->range_end == LLONG_MAX)
range_whole = 1;
- if (wbc->range_cyclic)
+ if (wbc->range_cyclic) {
index = mapping->writeback_index;
- else
+ wbc->range_start = index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+ wbc->range_end = LLONG_MAX;
+ wbc->range_cyclic = 0;
+ range_cyclic = 1;
+ cycled = 0;
+ } else
index = wbc->range_start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
mpd.wbc = wbc;
@@ -2504,6 +2510,7 @@ static int ext4_da_writepages(struct add
wbc->no_nrwrite_index_update = 1;
pages_skipped = wbc->pages_skipped;
+retry:
while (!ret && wbc->nr_to_write > 0) {
/*
@@ -2546,6 +2553,7 @@ static int ext4_da_writepages(struct add
pages_written += mpd.pages_written;
wbc->pages_skipped = pages_skipped;
ret = 0;
+ io_done = 1;
} else if (wbc->nr_to_write)
/*
* There is no more writeout needed
@@ -2554,6 +2562,13 @@ static int ext4_da_writepages(struct add
*/
break;
}
+ if (!io_done && !cycled) {
+ cycled = 1;
+ index = 0;
+ wbc->range_start = index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+ wbc->range_end = mapping->writeback_index - 1;
+ goto retry;
+ }
if (pages_skipped != wbc->pages_skipped)
printk(KERN_EMERG "This should not happen leaving %s "
"with nr_to_write = %ld ret = %d\n",
@@ -2561,6 +2576,7 @@ static int ext4_da_writepages(struct add
/* Update index */
index += pages_written;
+ wbc->range_cyclic = range_cyclic;
if (wbc->range_cyclic || (range_whole && wbc->nr_to_write > 0))
/*
* set the writeback_index so that range_cyclic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists