[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <499D7EEB.2070908@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:46:51 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>,
Alex Buell <alex.buell@...ted.org.uk>, adilger@....com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault <joe@....org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: EXT4 ENOSPC Bug
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 03:18:45AM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 02/18/2009 10:29 PM, Theodore Tso wrote:
>>> Ok, that's good. Good to know the workaround works.
>>> Can you send me a dumpe2fs of the filesystem in question? I'm curious
>>> what was going on...
>> Will do as soon as I am at the same place as the machine. I guess thats
>> only interesting to you privately (size and so on)?
>>
>>> Thanks for the report. I'll push the workaround patch to Linus for
>>> 2.6.29 to avoid this problem for now. I recently sent to linux-ext4
>>> for comment a patch to revamp the Orlov allocator for flex_bg and to
>>> use that instead of find_group_flex(), but no way that's going into
>>> 2.6.29 at this point....
>> Would it be helpfull if I test that patch?
>>
>
> Sure, I'll take all of the testing I can get. :-)
>
> The patch is in the ext4 patch queue, and I sent them to the ext4
> patch queue. The patch is also in patch work:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/23343/
>
> The patch which I sent you earlier (available below) is a prequisite:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/23228/
Ted, I hope the printk will be removed or at least ratelimited before it
gets upstream?
Thanks,
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists