[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090220102508.fc4e1feb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:25:08 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sct@...hat.com, adilger@....com, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext[234]: Return -EIO not -ESTALE on directory
traversal through deleted inode
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:53:39 -0500 Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(inode))) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(inode) == -ESTALE) {
> > + ext3_error(dir->i_sb, "ext2_lookup",
> > + "deleted inode referenced: %lu",
> > + ino);
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> > + } else {
> > + return ERR_CAST(inode);
> > + }
> > + }
>
> I just noticed that I forgot to edit the function name in the
> ext3_error and ext4_error invocations... Would it be better to send a
> delta to fix this or resubmit the whole thing?
I just edited the diffs on my copies - switched all three to __func__.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists