[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090309051701.C6465108040@picon.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 22:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 12829] kernel complains on ENOSPC
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12829
------- Comment #3 from aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com 2009-03-08 22:17 -------
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:02:21PM -0800, bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from tytso@....edu 2009-03-06 15:02 -------
> What are the precise reproduction details? We're supposed to keep track of
> how many delayed allocation blocks are outstanding, so that we return ENOSPC
> *before* we get to this stage.
Yes. We should not get the ENOSPC during writeback. That would imply the
block reservation is going wrong.
>
> I'm not sure we do the right thing if we mmap into an unallocated region of
> file; when do we actually track delayed allocation blocks? The right answer
> would be at mmap() time, but OTOH that means if we mmap a 2GB region, do we
> immediately take a 2GB charge because the process might write into this region?
> And does free space returned by 'df' immediately drop by 2GB?
For mmap block reservation is doing during page_mkwrite.
>
> Do you know if there was any allocation by mmap going on in your reproduction
> case? That seems the most likely cause to me, if I had to guess....
>
-aneesh
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists