[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49B53B66.50806@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:53:10 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
David Dindorp <ddi@...ex.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix header check in ext4_ext_search_right() for deep
extent trees.
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:50:51PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> This should resolve kernel.org bugzilla 12821
>>
>> I've not actually crafted a workload to exercise this code;
>> this is from inspection...
>
> Hmm, so I've been trying to create a test case, but the test cases
> I've created (which e2fsck say are fine) aren't causing complaints by
> the kernel.
>
> Please see:
>
> http://master.kernel.org/~tytso/deep-tree/
>
> deep-tree.img.gz contains an extent tree of depth 3, and
> deep-tree-2.img.gz contains an extent tree of depth 4....
>
> - Ted
I've had no trouble creating a deep tree, but I have had trouble making
it actually exercise the code in that loop.
I think the initial ext4_ext_find_extent() needs to land us in just the
right place such that the search_right must traverse back up & back down
the tree to get the nearest right allocation... I haven't sorted that
out yet.
I'd feel better w/ a testcase to demonstrate correctness too, but I'm
99.9% sure that the fix is correct by inspection, and would rather see
it get into .29 sooner than later unless you have strong misgivings.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists