linux-ext4 - Re: ext3 leaking buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49C80685.9060800@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:00:37 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	Don Porter <porterde@...utexas.edu>
CC:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext3 leaking buffer_heads

Don Porter wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> It appears that the ext3 journal code has a slow leak of buffer_head 
> structs.  Try this simple script:
> 
> perl -e 'while(1){ `sync`; }'
> 
> and monitor the count of allocated buffer_head structs in 
> /proc/slabinfo, and it seems to increase without bound.  Even after this 
> script is killed and the machine is left idle for several minutes, the 
> count of buffer heads doesn't substantially decrease.
> 
> Looking around at various machines I have access to, the count of 
> allocated buffer_heads roughly correlates with uptime when using ext3.  
> This is a slow leak - one would likely have to run this script for a day 
> or more to drain enough lowmem to cause problems.
> 
> Other info:  I have only tried this on x86 machines, but I have tried 
> both 2.6.22.6 and 2.6.28.8, and both have the problem.  I am running 
> Ubuntu 7.10 on top of these kernels, but the kernels were built directly 
> from kernel.org tarballs.
> 
> Any advice or help with this issue is greatly appreciated. 

Without investigating too far yet, I did try this, and did indeed see
the buffer_head usage go up while the script runs.

However, if I did:

# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches

before the script, and noted the total nr. of buffer heads in use, and
then did it again after the script had been running a while, I got back
to the same (low) count of buffer heads in use.   So I don't think this
is a leak as in "the system has lost all accounting of these buffer
heads" at least... but it'd be interesting to know what the reason for
the increase is, I'm not sure offhand.

-Eric



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html