lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <a4423d670903250818n512b1c67ja1b38db6d09ac7c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:18:43 +0300 From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com> To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs 2009/3/25 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>: >> > So, I think I need to try it on 2.6.29-rc7 again. >> I've looked into this. Obviously, what's happenning is that we delete >> an inode and jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode() finds inode is just under >> writeout in transaction commit and thus it waits. But it gets never woken >> up and because it has a handle from the transaction, every one eventually >> blocks on waiting for a transaction to finish. >> But I don't really see how that can happen. The code is really >> straightforward and everything happens under j_list_lock... Strange. > BTW: Is the system SMP? No, it is UP system. The bug exists even in 2.6.29, I posted it with a new topic. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists