[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090328011054.GA2155@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:10:54 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Thiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@...tum.de>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: add checks of block references for non-extent
inodes
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 03:15:56PM +0100, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
> Dear Ted,
>
> I'm sending an improved patch as I've come to the conclusion that the
> previous patch is too lenient in two ways:
> * off-by-one in the check of the upper block limit
> * it shouldn't stop when encountering a reference to block number zero
> because, if I'm not mistaken, references behind it still might be
> accessed in sparse files / when seeking behind the end of a file.
Note: this patch has a rather fatal flaw; it doens't check to make
sure that file is a regular file or directory first. If you have a
fast symlink, ext4_iget() will blow up since it's a non-extent file,
but the i_blocks[] will contain an ASCII string.
I'll fix up your patch to deal add the appropriate checking.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists