[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1238413667.30488.2.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:47:47 -0400
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix blkdev_issue_flush() failure handling
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 22:22 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:43:22PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> As long as we keep the call there this is probably good, but after
> >> talking w/ Chris Mason, I think the call is extraneous anyway and should
> >> probably just be removed...
> >>
> >
> > Yes, I agree, but it takes a lot of digging to be completely sure of
> > that it's safe to remove it. Interestingly, it was you who added the
> > patch which added the call to blkdev_issue_flush():
>
> > commit d755fb384250d6bd7fd18a0930e71965acc8e72e
> > Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
> > Date: Fri Jul 11 19:27:31 2008 -0400
>
>
> Yes, it was. Although I got the idea when hch pointed out that SuSE did
> this... thanks to Chris. It's come full circle. :)
Grin. I'm not sure the I_DIRTY checks alone are enough to decide that a
commit is required though. I think the inode could be clean but still
have metadata that needs commit.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists