linux-ext4 - Re: Ext4 tree backports for 2.6.27.13 and 2.6.28.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b637ec0b0903310502q56fc82eeobd5f62d24a367ac4@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:02:26 +0200
From:	Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@...il.com>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ext4 tree backports for 2.6.27.13 and 2.6.28.2

Is there a patch for 2.6.27.X for people not using git?


On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:19:35 -0500
> Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
>>
>> I've updated the for-stable and for-stable-2.6.27 branches against the
>> latest stable releases, and I've updated the two flawed backports in
>> the for-stable-2.6.27 branch.  Could you do a quick double-check and
>> make sure the fixes are as you expect, before I send a pull request to
>> stable@...nel.org?
>
> The 2.6.27 branch looks good to me.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html