[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D4D74F.1020904@ph.tum.de>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:18:39 +0200
From: Thiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@...tum.de>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.29-git: cannot mount ext4/loop
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:30:26PM +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
>> When I added the block range checks, initially I was assuming that
>> when EXTENTS_FL is not set, the inode->i_data *always* contains
>> references to further blocks. Ted showed me wrong and added the condition
>>
>> ISREG() || ISDIR() || ( ISLNK() && !is_fast_symlink() )
>>
>> before that assumption can be made. But maybe we need some further
>> restraints?
>
> It's a endian-problem; we're missing le32_to_cpu() in that patch.
> Sparc is big-endian.
Sorry for that.
Thiemo
---
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 98e289a..ec3555d 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -377,11 +377,11 @@ static int __ext4_check_blockref(const char
*function, struct inode *inode,
unsigned int maxblocks =
ext4_blocks_count(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_es);
unsigned int *bref = p;
while (bref < p+max) {
- if (unlikely(*bref >= maxblocks)) {
+ if (unlikely(le32_to_cpu(*bref) >= maxblocks)) {
ext4_error(inode->i_sb, function,
"block reference %u >= max (%u) "
"in inode #%lu, offset=%d",
- *bref, maxblocks,
+ le32_to_cpu(*bref), maxblocks,
inode->i_ino, (int)(bref-p));
return -EIO;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists