lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090409115132.9f7ccaf0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:51:32 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, ronny.pretzsch@....de,
	hare@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2: Do not update mtime of a move directory when
 parent has not changed

On Thu,  9 Apr 2009 20:41:32 +0200
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:

> If the parent of the moved directory has not changed, there's no real
> reason to change mtime. Specs doesn't seem to say anything about this
> particular case and e.g. ext3 does not change mtime in this case.
> So we become a tiny bit more consistent.
> 
> Spotted by ronny.pretzsch@....de, initial fix by J__rn Engel <joern@...fs.org>.
> 
> CC: ronny.pretzsch@....de
> CC: hare@...e.de
> Acked-by: J__rn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> ---
>  fs/ext2/namei.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/namei.c b/fs/ext2/namei.c
> index 90ea179..556f258 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/namei.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,10 @@ static int ext2_rename (struct inode * old_dir, struct dentry * old_dentry,
>  	inode_dec_link_count(old_inode);
>  
>  	if (dir_de) {
> -		ext2_set_link(old_inode, dir_de, dir_page, new_dir);
> +		/* Set link only if parent has changed and thus avoid setting
> +		 * of mtime of the moved directory on a pure rename. */
> +		if (old_dir != new_dir)
> +			ext2_set_link(old_inode, dir_de, dir_page, new_dir);
>  		inode_dec_link_count(old_dir);
>  	}
>  	return 0;

hm, what do other filesystems do?  We risk breaking things in either case.
Probably changing ext2 is safer than changing ext3/4, given that ext2 is
used less.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ