lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1239742633.28321.39.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:57:13 -0400
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ext3 data=guarded

Hello everyone,

Here is the ext3 data=guarded code again, this time it has passed some
basic tests.  It should safely leave non data=guarded mounts alone and
only be dangerous when the new code is turned on (I hope).

On the performance side, it runs the same as data=writeback, except when
you're making files with holes where it runs the same as data=ordered.

There's definitely more CPU time involved with tracking the data=guarded
buffer heads and updating i_size when the IO is over, but at least on my
5 drive array that doesn't show up.

For the fsync + background streaming write workload, data=guarded does
fsync's in 0.8s, just like data=writeback.  data=ordered on the same
test was doing between 5 and 30s per fsync, so it seems I've fixed that
part at least.

The next step is much more testing (blocksize != pagesize among others)
and much more review.  But, I'm hoping for some feedback first on if
this is a direction we want to take the ext3 code.

The diffstat looks scary, but lots of the changes are comments...

-chris


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ