[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090415195014.GB1668@shell>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:50:14 -0400
From: Valerie Aurora Henson <vaurora@...hat.com>
To: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@...com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][64-BIT] Miscellaneous e2fsprogs 64-bit patches - description
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 05:45:47PM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
> [I submitted the first three of these last week, but the first one,
> although the fix was correct (in the sense of fiddling with the correct
> bits), stylistically and from the point of code conventions and
> readability, was rather a botch. #2 and #3 are identical as patches but
> I fixed up parts of the commentary that were wrong or misleading. So I
> am reposting these as well as a couple of new ones. Please let me know
> if there are other problems of this sort. Thanks!]
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the testing and patches! I apologize for the delay in
replying; if it's any consolation, we were all at the Linux file
systems workshop when you sent this email.
All the patches look good to me (and I will ACK them individually). I
pulled them into my shared-64bit branch at:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=fs/ext2/val/e2fsprogs.git;a=summary
> P.S. Here is an interesting side issue:
>
> Patch 3 mentions that e2image ran to completion after the patch was applied
> (btw, in addition to the 16TiB file, the fs contains a directory with about
> 10^7 zero length files):
>
> # time e2image -r /dev/mapper/bigvg-bigvol /dev/null
> e2image 1.41.4-shared-64bit (27-Jan-2009)
>
> real 37m18.991s
> user 15m21.148s
> sys 17m57.151s
>
> but there is an interesting catch-22: how do I save its output?
>
> I can try the command line suggested in the manual page:
>
> e2image -r <dev> - | bzip2 > image.bz2
>
> but it takes forever: I started a run on Saturday and it was not
> done by Tuesday when I killed it - writing to the pipe at 4096 bytes
> a pop is very slow.
>
> Or I can forego the compression and try to save to a file: it's sparse
> (I only used 7GiB before it failed), but its nominal size exceeded the
> maximum file size limit on ext4, at which point I start getting lseek
> failures.
The 16TB limit on ext4 files is an enormous pain for testing 64-bit
(>= 16TB) file systems. I keep intending to write some simple dm
setup to concatenate two loopback files together, but instead I always
install XFS and create a loopback file on an XFS partition.
-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists