[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090416084430.GA14150@duck.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:44:30 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ext3 data=guarded v3
On Wed 15-04-09 13:35:23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Chris Mason wrote:
> >
> > Here is another version of the data=guarded work for ext3. The main
> > difference between this code and yesterday's is the guarded writepage
> > function now sends any newly allocated block through the old data=ordered code.
>
> I'm inclined to apply the first two patches as infrastructure, since they
> seem to make sense regardless of data=ordered. The ability to get a
> callback when IO ends sounds like something that a number of cases might
> find intriguing, and it's obviously how the actual IO has worked
> internally anyway.
>
> Comments?
Yes, the first two patches look fine to me. I tried to review the third
patch yesterday but my mind has blown up when trying to track all the
possible interactions and I started doing something else to preserve last
bits of sanity ;). Will retry later...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists