[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1240407745.2902.3.camel@wing-commander>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:42:25 +0100
From: Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blkid: add --disable-libblkid (v2)
Great to hear from you, Ted!
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 09:33 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Also, I have not dropped in the debian packaging changes which you
> made Scott, since you just conditionally made changes to the
> debian/rules and debian/config file, which means e2fsprogs would break
> on Debian (which hasn't even packaged util-linux-ng yet) and on
> versions of Ubuntu that haven't made the switch yet.
>
Yeah, that seems fair. I actually left both versions of the code in the
rules with the in-tree blkid stuff commented out assuming we'd ifeq
around them as we do with util-linux-ng.
The package went into a PPA not the archive, so it was in a "just get it
done and worry about making it look good later" state.
Obviously this doesn't solve the debian/control problem - that would
require generating it with/without the libblkid parts depending on
target distro.
> P.S. Scott, if you haven't been tracking linux-ext4, there are some
> rather critical resize2fs bugfixes that recently came into the tree,
> which fix bugs that cause filesystem corruption when growing or
> shrinking ext4 filesystems off-line.
>
Grabbed that, thanks!
We're absolutely final frozen for Jaunty now; the CDs were spun on
Monday, but the problem has been noted in our Release Notes.
Since the patches are reasonably small and uninvasive, we'll look into
them for a jaunty-updates upload.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
scott@...ntu.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists