lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1240450174-25868-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:29:34 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Make the extent validity check more paranoid

Instead of just checking that the extent block number is greater or
equal than s_first_data_block, make sure it it is not pointing into
the block group descriptors, since that is clearly wrong.  This helps
prevent filesystem from getting very badly corrupted in case an extent
block is corrupted.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c |   18 ++++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 6132353..c28ffe2 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -326,11 +326,14 @@ ext4_ext_max_entries(struct inode *inode, int depth)
 
 static int ext4_valid_extent(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_extent *ext)
 {
-	ext4_fsblk_t block = ext_pblock(ext);
+	ext4_fsblk_t block = ext_pblock(ext), valid_block;
 	int len = ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext);
 	struct ext4_super_block *es = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_es;
-	if (unlikely(block < le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) ||
-			((block + len) > ext4_blocks_count(es))))
+
+	valid_block = le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) +
+		EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_gdb_count;
+	if (unlikely(block <= valid_block ||
+		     ((block + len) > ext4_blocks_count(es))))
 		return 0;
 	else
 		return 1;
@@ -339,10 +342,13 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_extent *ext)
 static int ext4_valid_extent_idx(struct inode *inode,
 				struct ext4_extent_idx *ext_idx)
 {
-	ext4_fsblk_t block = idx_pblock(ext_idx);
+	ext4_fsblk_t block = idx_pblock(ext_idx), valid_block;
 	struct ext4_super_block *es = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_es;
-	if (unlikely(block < le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) ||
-			(block >= ext4_blocks_count(es))))
+
+	valid_block = le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) +
+		EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_gdb_count;
+	if (unlikely(block <= valid_block ||
+		     (block >= ext4_blocks_count(es))))
 		return 0;
 	else
 		return 1;
-- 
1.5.6.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ