linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH RFC] ext3 data=guarded v5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1240943582.5611.15.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:33:02 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ext3 data=guarded v5

On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 14:04 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:

> This patch adds the delayed i_size update to ext3, along with a new
> mount option (data=guarded) to enable it.

Is there a good reason to require a new mount option for this vs just
calling it a fix (or enhancement) to the existing writeback option?

I presume yes (you are fs guy..), but wonder what that reason is.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html