[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090428152908.1e98e991@zest.trausch.us>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:29:08 -0400
From: "Michael B. Trausch" <mbt@...t.trausch.us>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@...il.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
mike-mobile@...usch.us
Subject: Re: ext4 undeletion question
(Andreas, sorry for the dup, forgot to hit reply-all the last time. My
fault.)
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:53:46 -0600
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com> wrote:
> The good news is that ext4 usually allocates file blocks contiguously
> so if you can find the inodes themselves in the journal you can likely
> extract most of the data just by printing the in-inode extents to find
> the block ranges and then dumping the file data with 'dd'.
So, here's what my current situation is:
* I deleted a .bzr directory which contains files and additional
directories. AFAIK, directories are just "files", but exposed
differently to the operating system, yes? So I should be able to,
if I were to find its inode, find all of its descendants, too, to
bring them back, right? I don't have a directory listing from
before the deletion, and I presume that would make all the
difference in the world. Also, I'd need to figure out which one
would be the correct one; I've deleted other .bzr directories (as
part of their directory trees) repeatedly in the past on this
filesystem.
* This filesystem was in fact created as ext4. I'd attempted an
upgrade some time ago, but the upgrade took *ages* and so I aborted
it early, reformatted, and restored my home directory from a
tarball on the new filesystem.
* I know where in the directory tree the .bzr directory had a link,
obviously. I don't know if that information is helpful or not,
though, unless having the inode # of the containing directory is
useful in some way.
* I don't know _anything_ about how journaling works, but I do know
that the directory was about a week old (just young enough to not
be on a backup; since some hardware changes were made I hadn't
started my hourly rsnapshot back up since I don't currently have a
drive to rsnapshot to---d'oh!)
I'd be happy to look into options, though as I mentioned in my previous
message, I am not a solid system-level programmer (at least in my own
personal opinion). I could probably figure it out, given enough time,
but when it comes to C (or C++) I just plain _suck_. I am trying to
improve that, though.
--- Mike
--
I don't really know that anybody's proven that a random collection of
people doing their own thing actually creates value.
--- Steve Ballmer, 2007
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists