| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200905011519.n41FJcBu021652@demeter.kernel.org> Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 15:19:38 GMT From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 12151] Unexplained fsck errors on a ext4 filesystem http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12151 --- Comment #9 from Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> 2009-05-01 15:19:38 --- (In reply to comment #7) > I have been running Fedora's kernels the whole time, and I haven't seen this > issue with 2.6.29 kernels. I don't think I saw it with 2.6.28 kernels either. I > wonder if Fedora has been putting more patches for ext4 in over what goes into > Linus's tree. Nathan - well, not really. I'll never put something in fedora that hasn't been sent upstream, it's not how we work. One difference may be that the 2.6.27 kernels in F10 did have the ext4 "stable" backports that Ted was doing... If you're running .29 kernels from fedora, it should be equivalent to what's upstream. The only changes in F11 for example are: Patch2920: linux-2.6-ext4-flush-on-close.patch Patch2921: linux-2.6-ext4-really-print-warning-once.patch -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists